Report this review of Mr Matthew Potter

If you believe this review is inappropriate and breaks the terms and conditions of iWantGreatCare, please let us know by entering your email address and clicking the button below. Your email address is required to prevent abuse of the service through ensuring you are a real person. Your email address will not be used for marketing purposes, further information can be viewed in iWantGreatCare's privacy policy.

Written by a private patient
1st June 2021


This is an update following a previous review from 2017 which was written 2 months following surgery for gynaecomastia. Immediately following surgery I had reservations about the result, as the swelling suggested that there may be a significant amount of tissue remaining. However, I was willing to wait several months to see whether it would settle down. I contacted Mr.Potter approx 6 months post op to express concerns that the case had been undercorrected, showing little aesthetic improvement from pre-op. Upon examination, Mr.Potter remarked that I must have put on weight and recommended diet and exercise. However, I am and was, well within the normal weight range for my height. As anyone familiar with the condition knows, diet and exercise will not eliminate this tissue. I was sent the pathology report including tissue analysis which confirmed that a mass of approx dimensions 30 x 40 mm had been excised from both sides. The excision of this tissue did not alter the contour of the chest and therefore did not address the objective of the surgery: to treat a case of gynaecomastia. This condition affects every area of life including relationships and mental health and especially self esteem. I believe it is a deceptively complex procedure as the tissue can be fibrous and diffuse. The literature recommends choosing a surgeon very carefully. Regrettably, I did not ask for sufficient evidence of previous experience. Mr.Potter described a case where he had to revise another surgeons work who had overcorrected a case. I believe this experience biased Mr.Potter and resulted in his overly cautious approach. I can only blame myself for not asking the necessary questions at the outset. Four years on, this condition still has a significant detrimental affect on my well being and I am left considering whether to go through the whole process again. In Mr.Potters defence, he did offer to waive the surgeon's fee for a second surgery. However, I felt at this point the trust had been lost and the experience of raising concerns had been quite confrontational and stressful. I therefore declined. I am not sure if Mr Potter still offers this surgery (I suspect not), however I would strongly advise looking at other surgeons to treat your gynaecomastia.

Recommend
Trust
Listening